As we all know, since华为After the Mate60 series is listed, everyone is right麒麟9000S pays special attention, someone takes it and it苹果A17 Pro compares, but some people say that comparison with Apple A17 is not good, after all, one is an iOS platform, one is considered安卓platform.
Recently,三星NewestThe self -developed flagship chip Exynos 2400 running score was exposed. This is Samsung's strongest and latest chip. In addition高通In the running score of Snapdragon 8GEN3, let's compare these three chips to see how big the gap is.By the way, I also compare Apple's A17 Pro.
The running software usesGeekbench6, because it is a software on the Android platform, running points under the same platform is relatively fair and fair.
Let's talk about Samsung firstExynos 2400, this chip will be the starting of Samsung S24, is about to be available, and currently
This chip has appeared on Geekbench.
The single -core score is 2067, while the multi -core score is 6520 points, and the performance is very good.
Looking at it, Qualcomm's latest chip Snapdragon 8GEN3, this chip has not been released, but its running score has flowed out, and it is also a chip used in some versions of Samsung S24.
From the perspective of running points, the single -core is as high as 2233 points, while the multi -core is 6661 points, which is much stronger than Samsung's Exynos2400.
Then look at Huawei Kirin 9000s, which is the sameGeekebench6's running score, single -core is 1337 points, and multiple cores are 4033 points.This result is a lot lower than Qualcomm and Samsung.
Finally, we put on Apple A17 Pro againGeekebench6's running scores are compared. Geekebench6's running score is 2908 points in single -core, and multi -core is 7238 points.
These 4处理器Among them, Apple A17, Samsung Exynos2400, and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8GEN3 are all 3nm chips, and the technology of Huawei Kirin 9000S is unknown. Some people say that it is 14nm, some people say 7nm, and some people say that it is 5nm.The performance is 100%. See how much the other three chips will be high. Look at the gap.
It can be seen that the Apple A17 is indeed far ahead. The single core is more than twice as well as the multi -core, and the multi -core is about 1.8 times. It is Qualcomm 8Gen3, and it is Samsung Exynos2400.
Of course, the above running scores are from the network. Among them, Samsung and Qualcomm's chips are not released, so the running points are not necessarily accurate, but the differences will not be particularly large.With.
In addition, running points are justCPUA reference value of performance. The actual mobile phone experience is related to the system, optimization, APP, etc.